EMPRENDIMIENTO EN PROGRAMAS DE DOCTORADO: PERSPECTIVAS DE DOCTORANDOS Y PROFESORES SOBRE EL CONTENIDO DE LOS CURSOS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1261-386X
Patricia Alonso-Álvarez
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9305-6024
Elías Sanz-Casado
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0188-7489
José Carlos García-Zorita
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6860-8069
Resumo
La literatura académica confirma la diferencia entre las perspectivas de estudiantes y profesores a la hora de diseñar y aplicar metodologías de enseñanza. Este trabajo utiliza el caso de la enseñanza de emprendimiento en programas doctorales para señalar las diferencias entre ambos grupos en el propio contenido de los módulos y la necesidad de incorporar las perspectivas de los estudiantes en el diseño de este tipo de cursos. Este artículo parte del proyecto prodPhD, financiado dentro del programa H2020-Swarfs y comenzado en 2020 y expone algunos de sus primeros resultados. El objetivo de esta fase del proyecto es el diseño de herramientas de recuperación de información que permitan conocer las necesidades de la comunidad universitaria (en particular, estudiantes y profesores de programas doctorales) en cuanto a la educación en emprendimiento. Se aplica, para ello, metodología mixta, que incluye encuestas a estudiantes y profesores y entrevistas a estudiantes de varias universidades y países europeos. En una primera fase, se distribuyeron las entrevistas a través de los puntos de contacto de las universidades. Tras el análisis de los resultados, se realizaron entrevistas a aquellos participantes que mostraron interés en continuar en el estudio. Los resultados revelan que, en el terreno del emprendimiento, estudiantes y profesores tienen prioridades diferentes. Es, por tanto, necesario tratar de compaginar ambas perspectivas y complementar las necesidades de los alumnos con el conocimiento y experiencia de los profesores para crear cursos atractivos y que ofrezcan a los estudiantes recursos para terminar su formación con un perfil acorde a sus necesidades profesionales.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Como Citar
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
openAccess
openAccess
Syed Zamberi Ahmad & Robert Frederick Buchanan (2015). Entrepreneurship education in Malaysian universities, Tertiary Education and Management, 21(4), 349-366, 10.1080/13583883.2015.1106577
Almobaireek, W.N. & Manolova, T.S. (2012) Who Wants to Be an Entrepreneur? Entrepreneurial Intentions among Saudi University Students. African Journal of Business Management, 6, 4029-4040. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.1521
Arasti, Z., Falavarjani, M. K., & Imanipour, N. (2012). A Study of Teaching Methods in Entrepreneurship Education for Graduate Students. Higher education studies, 2(1), 2-10. 10.5539/hes.v2n1p2
Bienkowska, D., & Klofsten, M. (2012). Creating entrepreneurial networks: academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education. Higher Education, 64(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9488-x
Cope, J. (2005). Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 29(4), 373-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00090.x
Corrales, K. A., Paba Rey, L. A., & Santiago Escamilla, N. (2016). Is EMI enough? Perceptions from university professors and students. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5294/7094
Davey, T., Hannon, P., & Penaluna, A. (2016). Entrepreneurship education and the role of universities in entrepreneurship: Introduction to the special issue. Industry and higher education, 30(3), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422216656699
Gibb, A. (2002). In pursuit of a new ‘enterprise’ and ‘entrepreneurship’ paradigm for learning: creative destruction, new values, new ways of doing things and new combinations of knowledge. International journal of management reviews, 4(3), 233-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00086
Gómez-Rey, Pilar; Barbera, Elena; Fernández-Navarro, Francisco (2016). Measuring teachers and learners’ perceptions of the quality of their online learning experience. Distance Education, 37(2), 146–163. doi:10.1080/01587919.2016.1184396
Groves, R.M., Fowler Jr, F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E. & Tourangeau, R. (2011) Survey methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
Hurt, R. L., & McLaughlin, E. J. (2012). An applied introduction to qualitative research methods in academic advising. NACADA Journal, 32(1), 63-71.
Hytti, U., & O’Gorman, C. (2004). What is “enterprise education”? An analysis of the objectives and methods of enterprise education programmes in four European countries. Education+ training. 46(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910410518188
Joye, D., Wolf, C., Smith, T. & Fu, Y. (2016). Survey methodology: challenges and principles. In Joye, D., Wolf, C., Smith, T. & Fu, Y. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of survey Methodology (pp. 3-15). SAGE Publications Ltd, https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893
Lindh, I., & Thorgren, S. (2016). Entrepreneurship education: the role of local business. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(5-6), 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1134678
Love, H. R., & Corr, C. (2022). Integrating Without Quantitizing: Two Examples of Deductive Analysis Strategies Within Qualitatively Driven Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689821989833
Myers, S. A., Horan, S. M., Kennedy-Lightsey, C. D., Madlock, P. E., Sidelinger, R. J., Byrnes, K., ... & Mansson, D. H. (2009). The relationship between college students' self-reports of class participation and perceived instructor impressions. Communication Research Reports, 26(2), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090902861580
Muscio, A., & Ramaciotti, L. (2019). How does academia influence Ph. D. entrepreneurship? New insights on the entrepreneurial university. Technovation, 82, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.02.003
Nardi, P.M. (2018) Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. Routledge.
Neck, H. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2018). The scholarship of teaching and learning entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 8-41.
Nicotra, M., Del Giudice, M., & Romano, M. (2021). Fulfilling University third mission: towards an ecosystemic strategy of entrepreneurship education. Studies in Higher Education, 46(5), 1000-1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896806.
Pearcy, M. (2014). Student, teacher, professor: Three perspectives on online education. The History Teacher, 47(2), 169-185. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43264218.
Peng, Z., Lu, G., & Kang, H. (2013). Entrepreneurial intentions and its influencing factors: A survey of the university students in Xi’an China. Creative education, 3(08), 95. 10.4236/ce.2012.38B021
Rosenberg, H., & Asterhan, C. S. (2018). “Whatsapp, teacher?”-student perspectives on teacher-student Whatsapp interactions in secondary schools. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 205-226. https://doi.org/10.28945/4081
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and corporate change, 16(4), 691-791. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm023
Seikkula?Leino, J., Ruskovaara, E., Ikavalko, M., Mattila, J. & Rytkola, T. (2010), Promoting entrepreneurship education: the role of the teacher?, Education + Training, 54(2), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011027716
Tjeerdsma, B. L. (1997). A comparison of teacher and student perspectives of tasks and feedback. Journal of teaching in physical education, 16(4), 388-400. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.16.4.388
Torres, C. T. (2010). Consideraciones para la formación en emprendimiento: explorando nuevos ámbitos y posibilidades. Estudios gerenciales, 26(117), 41-60.
Zappe, S., Hochstedt, K., Kisenwether, E., & Shartrand, A. (2013). Teaching to innovate: Beliefs and perceptions of instructors who teach entrepreneurship to engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(1), 45-62.