A IMPLEMENTAÇÃO DOS RESULTADOS DA INVESTIGAÇÃO QUALITATIVA: CONTRIBUTOS, DESAFIOS E TENDÊNCIAS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumen
O avanço rápido da investigação e a proliferação mundial dos seus resultados são um ganho indiscutível para o desenvolvimento da sociedade, com traduções claras nos avanços tecnológicos, sociais e humanos. Este acréscimo de estudos e a disseminação dos resultados são um repto para os investigadores, que, por um lado, têm acesso a estudos diversos sobre um dado tema, mas continuam a ter o desafio de fazer chegar os resultados da investigação ao cidadão e à sociedade. Esta dificuldade é transversal a todas as áreas de conhecimento e nota-se, sobretudo, na implementação dos resultados dos estudos qualitativos. Não obstante a crescente aceitação do conhecimento produzido nos paradigmas construtivista e interpretativista de investigação, as guidelines e os estudos de síntese de evidências continuam a privilegiar modelos positivistas, com perdas na compreensão da complexidade e da riqueza dos fenómenos sociais e humanos, perdendo-se insights valorosos para a compreensão dos acontecimentos, isoladamente ou em complementaridade com abordagens quantitativas. O que se apresenta neste artigo objetiva não só a discussão dos desenhos de investigação, mas também a redefinir como se interligam a síntese de evidências e o respetivo método científico para o fazer, e reconsiderar os modelos que são usados para transferir e implementar o ‘conhecimento Quali’ em contextos com especificidades culturais e recursos disponíveis dispares.
Descargas
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Cómo citar
Derechos de autor 2024 New Trends in Qualitative Research

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
openAccess
openAccess
Agostinho, I., Reis, N., Sousa, L., Ferreira, R., Miranda da Silva, M., & Baixinho, C. (2024). Implementing Quali Evidence - A Challenge For Evidence Ecosystems. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 20(3), e1063. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.20.3.2024.e1063
Apóstolo, J. (2017). Síntese da evidência no contexto da translação da ciência. Coimbra, Portugal: Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (ESEnfC).
Apóstolo, J. L., & Silva, R. C. (2021). Ciência cidadã e aberta em tempos de pandemia!. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 5(Supl. 8), e21EDS8. https://doi.org/10.12707/RV21EDS8
Baixinho, C.L., Ferreira, Ó., Marques F.M., Oliveira, E., Presado M.H., Cardoso M., Sousa, A., & Nascimento T. (2022). Síntese, transferência e implementação de evidência qualitativa para a melhoria das práticas e da decisão clínica. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 13. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.13.2022.e568
Beck, S., Mahdad, M., Beukel, K., & Poetz, M. (2019). The Value of Scientific Knowledge Dissemination for Scientists—A Value Capture Perspective. Publications. 2019; 7(3):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030054
Baumbusch, J.L., Kirkham, S.R., Khan, K.B., McDonald, H., Semeniuk, P., Tan, E., & Anderson, J.M. (2008). Pursuing Common Agendas: A Collaborative Model for Knowledge Translation between Research and Practice in Clinical Settings. Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 130–40. http://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20242
Cardoso, M., Baixinho, C.L., Ferreira, O., Nascimento, P., Pedrosa, R., Gonçalves, P. (2021). Learning evidence based practice through involvement in investigation activities - the self-perception of students. Cogit. Enferm. 26:e79806. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v26i0.79806
Cartabellotta, A., & Tilson, J. K. (2019). The ecosystem of evidence cannot thrive without efficiency of knowledge generation, synthesis, and translation. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 110, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.008
Chambers, D.A., Glasgow, R.E., & Stange, K.C. (2013). The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science, 16(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-117
Hamilton, A.B., & Finley, E.P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry research, 280, 112516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516
Herfeld, C., & Lisciandra, C. (2019). Knowledge transfer and its contexts. Studies in history and philosophy of science, 77, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.06.002
Hoddinott, P., Pollock, A., O'Cathain, A., Boyer, I., Taylor, J., MacDonald, C., Oliver, S., & Donovan, J. L. (2018). How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research. F1000Research, 7, 752. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15162.1
Graham, I.D., Logan, J., Harrison, M.B., Straus, S.E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof.;26(1):13-24. http://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47.
Dekker, I., & Meeter, M. (2022) Evidence-based education: Objections and future directions. Frontiers in Education. 7:941410. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.941410
Janati, A., Hasanpoor, E., Hajebrahimi, S., Sadeghi-Bazargani, H., & Khezri, A. (2018). An Evidence-Based Framework for Evidence-Based Management in Healthcare Organizations: A Delphi Study. Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 28(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v28i3.8
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. The European journal of general practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
Kucharska, W. (2017). Relationships between Trust and Collaborative Culture in The Context of Tacit Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation. 13(4), 61-78. 25, 2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3109309
Loura, D. S., Bernardes, R. A., Baixinho, C. L., Henriques, H. R., Félix, I. B., & Guerreiro, M. P. (2021). Nursing students' learning from involvement in research projects: an integrative literature review. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 75(1), e20210053. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0053
Liu, F., Lu, Y., & Wang, P. (2020) Why Knowledge Sharing in Scientific Research Teams Is Difficult to Sustain: An Interpretation From the Interactive Perspective of Knowledge Hiding Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:537833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537833
Miranda da Silva, M., Soares Lavareda Baixinho, C. R., Mendes Marques, M. F., Oliveira, C. S., de Moura Bubadué, R., Franco de Souza, S. V., & Cabral, I. E. (2024). Promoting knowledge translation: An ecosystem approach to evidence in health. Heliyon, 10(7), e28871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28871
Muller, I., Santer, M., Morrison, L., Morton, K., Roberts, A., Rice, C., Williams, M., & Yardley, L. (2019). Combining qualitative research with PPI: reflections on using the person-based approach for developing behavioural interventions. Research involvement and engagement, 5, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0169-8
Presado, M.H., Baixinho, C.L., & Oliveira, E.S.F. (2021). Qualitative research in pandemic times. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2021;74(suppl 1):e74Suppl101. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167.202174Suppl101.
Pope, C., Mays, N., & Popay, J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: a guide to methods. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Prihodova, L., Guerin, S., Tunney, C., & Kernohan, W.G. (2019). Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: Findings from a systematic scoping review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13836
Proctor, E., Ramsey, A. T., Saldana, L., Maddox, T. M., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2022). FAST: A Framework to Assess Speed of Translation of Health Innovations to Practice and Policy. Global implementation research and applications, 2(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00045-4
Proctor, E. K., & Rosen, A. (2008). From Knowledge Production to Implementation: Research Challenges and Imperatives. Research on social work practice, 18(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507302263
Renjith, V., Yesodharan, R., Noronha, J. A., Ladd, E., & George, A. (2021). Qualitative Methods in Health Care Research. International journal of preventive medicine, 12, 20. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_321_19
Thirsk, L. M., & Clark, A. M. (2017). Using Qualitative Research for Complex Interventions: The Contributions of Hermeneutics. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917721068
Vandvik, P. O., Brandt, L., Alonso-Coello, P., Treweek, S., Akl, E. A., Kristiansen, A., Fog-Heen, A., Agoritsas, T., Montori, V. M., & Guyatt, G. (2013). Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent. Chest, 144(2), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.13-0746
World Health Organization (2021). Evidence, policy, impact. WHO guide for evidence-informed decision-making. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Yardley, L., Bradbury, K., & Morrison, L. (2021). Using qualitative research for intervention development and evaluation. In P. M. Camic (Ed.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (2nd ed., pp. 263–282). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000252-013
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-5349