Reflexive Thematic Analysis Across Unequal Educational Contexts: Methodological Lessons
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Recent scholarship on the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has increasingly emphasized its potential to transform teaching and learning. However, less attention has been given to how AI use is interpreted, mediated, and adapted across unequal educational contexts. This study examines how English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers mediate AI integration across three Indonesian districts representing relatively higher-, intermediate-, and lower-resource literacy contexts, and reflects on the methodological implications of conducting qualitative inquiry in such diverse settings. Employing a multi-site qualitative design, the study drew on three complementary data sources: a background questionnaire containing open-ended responses, Professional Learning Community (PLC) observations, and semi-structured interviews with 18 teachers. Data were analysed through Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) and context-sensitive cross-site comparison. Consistent with an interpretive orientation, themes were constructed through iterative engagement with the data, researcher reflexivity, and comparison across sites rather than being treated as objectively discovered patterns. The analysis generated three interrelated themes: teacher-driven and purpose-oriented AI use, negotiation of pedagogical and ethical risks, and contextually differentiated pathways of AI integration. Teachers in the relatively higher-resource literacy context described more integrated and student-facing uses of AI; those in the intermediate-resource literacy context reported more selective and supplementary use; while those in the relatively lower-resource literacy context primarily used AI for lesson preparation and offline adaptation. These differences indicate that AI integration is shaped by teacher agency, as well as by infrastructure, digital culture, and institutional support. Methodologically, the study demonstrates the value of combining multi-source qualitative data, Reflexive Thematic Analysis, researcher reflexivity, and cross-site comparison to examine educational technology practices across unequal settings. It also shows how contextual asymmetries can be treated as analytical resources rather than methodological limitations, offering transferable insights for multi-site qualitative research in diverse educational environments.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Como Citar
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 New Trends in Qualitative Research
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
openAccess
openAccess
Al-Bogami, R. M., & Alahmadi, N. A. (2025). Effects of an AI-based reading progress tool on third-grade EFL learners’ oral reading fluency. Computers and Education Open, 9, 100283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100283
Amouri, H., Haroud, S., Ouchaouka, L., & Saqri, N. (2025). Acceptability of artificial intelligence in inclusive education: a TAM2-based study among preservice teachers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1616327. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1616327
Arranz-García, O., García, M. del C. R., & Alonso-Secades, V. (2025). Perceptions, Strategies, and Challenges of Teachers in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Primary Education: A Systematic Review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 24, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.28945/5458
Bachtiar, B. (2025). Preparing Citizens for the Future of Digital Literacy and AI: With a Focus on Indonesian EFL Teachers. In Digital Citizenship and the Future of AI Engagement, Ethics, and Privacy (pp. 405–440). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9015-3.ch015
Bachtiar, B., Juhana, J., & Pratiwi, W. R. (2024). Indonesian English language teachers’ conceptions of critical thinking: Challenge and strategy. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(1), 617–625. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.26467
Bachtiar, B., Sylvia, S., & Konchiab, S. (2026). Impact of Instructional Strategies, Classroom Management, and Student Engagement on Teachers’ Professional Practices. AsTEN Journal of Teacher Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.56278/asten.v10i1.4089
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Bulathwela, S., Pérez-Ortiz, M., Holloway, C., Cukurova, M., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Alone Will Not Democratise Education: On Educational Inequality, Techno-Solutionism and Inclusive Tools. Sustainability, 16(2), 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020781
Chehimi, G. M., & Hejase, H. J. (2025). Influence of Generative Artificial Intelligence on English Language Teaching. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v12n1p1
Chiu, T. K. F., Falloon, G., Song, Y., Wong, V. W. L., Zhao, L., & Ismailov, M. (2024). A self-determination theory approach to teacher digital competence development. Computers and Education, 214, 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105017
Choi, K. Y., Wu, C., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2025). Exploring the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in English language teaching: Voices from in-service teachers at an early-adopting Hong Kong secondary school. Technology in Language Teaching and Learning, 7(3), 102516. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v7n3.102516
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
de Sousa, F. R., Mascia, M. A. A., & Carrasqueira, K. (2025). Ethics and academic integrity: challenges and possibilities in using Artificial Intelligence in the scientific editorial process. Praxis Educativa, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.20.25513.083
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
García-López, I. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & Molina-Espinosa, J. M. (2026). Generative artificial intelligence in education: A systematic analysis of opportunities, challenges, and responses. Interactive Learning Environments, 34(3), 1194–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2519133
Irasuti, I., & Bachtiar, B. (2024). Empowering Indonesian EFL Teachers: The Transformative Impact of Visual Literacy Training on Teaching Materials. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(8), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.8.7
Jin, F., Peng, X., Sun, L., Song, Z., Zhou, K., & Lin, C. H. (2025). Knowledge (Co-)Construction Among Artificial Intelligence, Novice Teachers, and Experienced Teachers in an Online Professional Learning Community. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(2), e70004. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70004
Juhana, J., Puspitasari, M., & Bachtiar, B. (2026). Translanguaging in the EFL classroom: Bridging Language Barriers for Inclusive and Motivated Learning. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 54, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2026.54.04
Kankpog, E. B., Sulemana, M., & Issaka, C. A. (2024). Influence of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) on Teacher Professional Development (TPD) in Basic Schools in the Tamale Metropolis. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(7), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.2272
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kouam, A. W. F., & Muchowe, R. M. (2025). Assessing the role of AI technology in mitigating the equity gap in educational access in Zimbabwe: Barriers and implications. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2025.8.1.15
Kovalenko, I., & Baranivska, N. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence in English language teaching: Exploring the potential and challenges of AI tools in enhancing language learning outcomes and personalized education. European Socio-Legal & Humanitarian Studies, 3(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.61345/2734-8873.2024.1.9
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Namaziandost, E., & Rezai, A. (2024). Special Issue: Artificial Intelligence in Open and Distributed Learning: Does It Facilitate or Hinder Teaching and Learning? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.8070
Peña-Acuña, B., & Durão, C. F. R. (2024). Learning English as a second language with artificial intelligence for prospective teachers: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 9,1490067. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1490067
Pitychoutis, K. M., & Rawahi, A. Al. (2024). Smart Teaching: The Synergy of Multiple Intelligences and Artificial Intelligence in English as a Foreign Language Instruction. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(6), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7297
Pokharel, K. R., Paudel, S., & Marasini, A. (2024). Revisiting the Case Study Method in Social Research: A Reflective and Argumentative Review for Novice Researchers. Educational Journal, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3126/ej.v3i1.82043
Pratiwi, W. R., Kuswoyo, H., Puspitasari, M., Juhana, & Bachtiar. (2024). Driving to communicative approach: The innovative teaching speaking methods in Indonesian English immersion program. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(1), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25420
Rane, J., Kaya, Ö., Mallick, S. K., & Rane, N. L. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT and its implications for practice and research. In Generative Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, Education, and Business (pp. 142–161). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-981271-7-4_4
Rice, B. T., Rasmus, S., Onders, R., Thomas, T., Day, G., Wood, J., Britton, C., Hernandez-Boussard, T., & Hiratsuka, V. (2025). Community-engaged artificial intelligence: An upstream, participatory design, development, testing, validation, use and monitoring framework for artificial intelligence and machine learning models in the Alaska Tribal Health System. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8,1568886. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1568886
Ruiz Viruel, S., Sánchez Rivas, E., & Ruiz Palmero, J. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Project-Based Learning: Teacher Perceptions and Pedagogical Implications. Education Sciences, 15(2), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020150
Sharma, R., Kumar, P., Singh, D. K., Suri, D., Rajput, P., & Kumar, S. (2024). The Intersection of AI, Ethics, and Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. 2024 International Conference on Computing and Data Science (ICCDS), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCDS60734.2024.10560363
Solihin, L., Utama, B., Pratiwi, I., & Novirina. (2019). Indeks aktivitas literasi membaca di 34 provinsi (Reading literacy activity index at 34 provinces). Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Vetter, M. A., Lucia, B., Jiang, J., & Othman, M. (2024). Towards a framework for local interrogation of AI ethics: A case study on text generators, academic integrity, and composing with ChatGPT. Computers and Composition, 71, 102831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102831
Wuttikamonchai, O. (2025). A blended and project-based learning management model using artificial intelligence to enhance Thai undergraduate student digital media creation skills. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(4), 2692–2705. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6640
Ya’u, M. S., & Mohammed, M. S. (2025). AI-Assisted Writing and Academic Literacy: Investigating the Dual Impact of Language Models on Writing Proficiency and Ethical Concerns in Nigerian Higher Education. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 13(2), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.13n.2p.593
Yousaf, M. N. (2025). Practical Considerations and Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Writing Scientific Manuscripts. ACG Case Reports Journal, 12(2), e01629. https://doi.org/10.14309/crj.0000000000001629
Yunus, M., & Bachtiar. (2025a). Beyond Access: Reframing Engagement, Assessment, and Feedback in Open and Distance Learning at Universitas Terbuka. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(6), 562–587. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.6.26
Yunus, M., & Bachtiar, B. (2025b). Exploring the complexities of thesis writing in the distance mode: Postgraduate students’ perspectives, challenges and strategies. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 20(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2024-0099
Yusra, S. R., & Hanifa, R. (2025). Unveiling Indonesian Higher Education Students’ English Academic Writing Misconduct in The Era of Technology & AI: Comprehension vs Practice. World Journal of English Language, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n5p220