##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Gabriel Silva Atencio https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4881-181X

Resumen

The persistent high incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) constitutes a critical public health challenge in Latin America, a region characterized by structural inequalities and epidemiological heterogeneity. Although artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated transformative potential for disease surveillance and diagnosis globally, its application within the Latin American context remains underexplored. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of AI applications for HIV and STI detection and prevention in Latin America, identifying principal technological advances, mapping the intellectual structure of this emerging field, and critically evaluating implementation advantages and limitations. Employing an exploratory qualitative design, a bibliometric review coupled with thematic synthesis was conducted. Five electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 2015 and December 2025. Following PRISMA guidelines, a multi-stage selection process involving two independent reviewers identified 28 empirical studies for final inclusion. Bibliometric mapping using VOSviewer examined keyword co-occurrence and collaborative networks, while thematic analysis using NVivo 14 integrated deductive and inductive coding. Bibliometric analysis revealed a rapidly expanding research landscape dominated by Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia. Thematic synthesis demonstrated that machine learning models, particularly ensemble methods such as XGBoost, consistently outperformed traditional approaches in predictive accuracy, achieving metrics exceeding 85% in regional validation studies. However, persistent challenges emerged: algorithmic bias from unrepresentative training data, fragmented health information systems, ethical concerns regarding data privacy, and a significant implementation gap between technical validation and public health impact. Artificial intelligence offers substantial promise for enhancing HIV and STI prevention in Latin America through improved diagnostic precision and targeted interventions. Realizing this potential requires sustained investment in digital infrastructure, interdisciplinary collaboration, and robust ethical governance frameworks to ensure equity and protect vulnerable populations.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Sección
Estudios empíricos con reflexión metodológica

Cómo citar

Silva Atencio, G. (2026). BIBLIOMETRIC REVIEW OF AI FOR HIV/STI IN LATIN AMERICA. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 22(3), e1248. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.22.3.2026.e1248
Referencias

Araujo, L., Martinez-Romo, J., Bisbal, O., Sanchez-de-Madariaga, R., Portilla, J., Portilla, I., Merino, E., García, G., Agea, I., Sánchez-Payá, J., Rodríguez, J. C., Giner, L., Reus, S., Boix, V., Torrus, D., Pérez, V., Portilla, J., Gómez, J. L., Hernández, J.,…The Cohort of the National, A. N. (2022). Discovering HIV related information by means of association rules and machine learning. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 18208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22695-y

Bellucci, N. (2022). Disruptive Innovation and Technological Influences on Healthcare. Journal of Radiology Nursing, 41(2), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jradnu.2022.02.008

Belur, J., Tompson, L., Thornton, A., & Simon, M. (2021). Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 837–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799372

Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475

Cabrera, D. M., Diaz, M. M., Grimshaw, A., Salvatierra, J., Garcia, P. J., & Hsieh, E. (2021). Aging with HIV in Latin America and the Caribbean: a Systematic Review. Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 18(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00538-7

Ciecierski-Holmes, T., Singh, R., Axt, M., Brenner, S., & Barteit, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for strengthening healthcare systems in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review. npj Digital Medicine, 5(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00700-y

Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (Vol. 4). SAGE Publications.

Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, I. D., Elendu, T. C., Amaechi, E. C., Usoro, E. U., Chima-Ogbuiyi, N. L., Agbor, D. B. A., Onwuegbule, C. J., & Afolayan, E. F. (2024). Global perspectives on the burden of sexually transmitted diseases: A narrative review. Medicine, 103(20), e38199. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038199

Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., & O’Cathain, A. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Bujold, M., & Wassef, M. (2017). Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0454-2

Jaiteh, M., Phalane, E., Shiferaw, Y. A., Voet, K. A., & Phaswana-Mafuya, R. N. (2024). Utilization of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Strengthening of HIV Testing: A Systematic Review. Algorithms, 17(8), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/a17080362

Kaushik, V., & Walsh, C. A. (2019). Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research. Social Sciences, 8(9), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255

Kumar, Y., Koul, A., Singla, R., & Ijaz, M. F. (2023). Artificial intelligence in disease diagnosis: a systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(7), 8459–8486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03612-z

Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Sage Publications.

Marcus, J. L., Sewell, W. C., Balzer, L. B., & Krakower, D. S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for HIV Prevention: Emerging Approaches to Ending the Epidemic. Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 17(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00490-6

Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative inquiry, 20(8), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733

Mutai, C. K., McSharry, P. E., Ngaruye, I., & Musabanganji, E. (2021). Use of machine learning techniques to identify HIV predictors for screening in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01346-2

Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-J

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Ratwani, R. M., Sutton, K., & Galarraga, J. E. (2024). Addressing AI Algorithmic Bias in Health Care. JAMA, 332(13), 1051–1052. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.13486

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers.

Seboka, B. T., Yehualashet, D. E., & Tesfa, G. A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Based Prediction of Viral Load and CD4 Status of People Living with HIV (PLWH) on Anti-Retroviral Treatment in Gedeo Zone Public Hospitals. International Journal of General Medicine, 16(null), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S397031

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques.

Suleimenov, I. E., Vitulyova, Y. S., Bakirov, A. S., & Gabrielyan, O. A. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: what is it? Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications, 22–25. (https://doi.org/10.1145/3397125.3397141)

Szrajber, B. E., & Alon, I. (2025). Reconciling qualitative and quantitative approaches within bibliometrics. Multinational Business Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-02-2025-0043

Takona, J. P. (2024). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches / sixth edition. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 1011–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01798-2

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Xiang, Y., Du, J., Fujimoto, K., Li, F., Schneider, J., & Tao, C. (2022). Application of artificial intelligence and machine learning for HIV prevention