##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Lucimara Fabiana Fornari https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8655-6549

Rosa Maria Godoy Serpa da Fonseca https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9440-0870

Abstract

Introduction: Human beings express their emotions through different types of language. The combination of verbal and non-verbal language makes it possible to broaden the capture of the senses and deepen the understanding of a certain social phenomenon. The use of software aims to support the systematization and optimization of the combined data analysis process; Goals: To map scientific production on the use of software for combined analysis of textual and visual data in qualitative research; Methods: Scope review carried out in four international databases (Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science), between September 2021 and January 2022. A semi-structured instrument was developed for data collection. The data processing and analysis process was supported by the Rayyan QCR application and the webQDA qualitative analysis software; Results: The final review sample consisted of 11 studies published between 2014 and 2022, mainly in the health area. The publications involved three types of qualitative analysis software: NVivo, Atlas.ti and MaxQda. Photography was the most used source to produce visual data, while focus and discussion groups stood out to produce textual data. Thematic analysis was used in most publications and the software essentially supported the data coding step in a combined way; Conclusions: The combined analysis of textual and visual data carried out with the support of software proved to be a methodological path still on the rise, given that the review identified only 11 studies published in the last eight years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Empirical Studies with Methodological Reflection

How to Cite

Lucimara Fabiana Fornari, & Rosa Maria Godoy Serpa da Fonseca. (2022). COMBINED TEXT AND IMAGE ANALYSIS USING SOFTWARE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: SCOPING REVIEW. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 13, e639. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.13.2022.e639
References

Alves, K. Y. A., Rodrigues, C. C. F. M., Salvador, P. T. C. de O., & Fernandes, S. D. de M. (2021). Use of photography in qualitative research in the health area: Scoping review. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 26(2), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021262.41052020

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.

Belon, A. P., Nieuwendyk, L. M., Vallianatos, H., & Nykiforuk, C. I. J. (2014). How community environment shapes physical activity: Perceptions revealed through the PhotoVoice method. Social Science and Medicine, 116, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.027

Bisung, E., Elliott, S. J., Abudho, B., Schuster-Wallace, C. J., & Karanja, D. M. (2015). Dreaming of toilets: Using photovoice to explore knowledge, attitudes and practices around water-health linkages in rural Kenya. Health and Place, 31, 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.12.007

Chae, H. S., Ha, E. Y., & Seo, A. E. (2017). A study on the packaging design of agro-food using a qualitative research technique. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 5, 472–481. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-779-5-472

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2018). Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: A critical reflection. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 18(2), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12165

Costa, A. P. (2016). Cloud Computing em Investigação Qualitativa: Investigação Colaborativa através do software webQDA. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 5(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2016v5i2.p153-161

Costa, A. P., & Amado, J. (2018). Content Analysis Supported by Software. Ludomedia.

Davidson, J., Paulus, T., & Jackson, K. (2016). Speculating on the Future of Digital Tools for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(7), 606–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415622505

Fiorin, J. L., & Savioli, F. P. (1999). Para entender o texto: leitura e redação (4th ed.). Editora Ática.

Flewitt, R., Price, S., & Korkiakangas, T. (2019). Multimodality: Methodological explorations. Qualitative Research, 19(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118817414

Glaw, X., Inder, K., Kable, A., & Hazelton, M. (2017). Visual Methodologies in Qualitative Research: Autophotography and Photo Elicitation Applied to Mental Health Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748215

Justesen, L., Mikkelsen, B. E., & Gyimóthy, S. (2014). Understanding hospital meal experiences by means of participant-driven-photo-elicitation. Appetite, 75, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.12.012

Kress, G. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 35–50). Routledge Handbook. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068

Minayo, M. C. de S. (2012). Qualitative analysis: theory, steps and reliability. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 17(3), 621–626. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000300007

Moswela, E., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2018). Double Jeopardy: Plight of Female Students with Disabilities in Botswana’s Higher Education. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 25(3), 384–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521518785721

Musoke, D., Ndejjo, R., Ekirapa-Kiracho, E., & George, A. S. (2016). Supporting youth and community capacity through photovoice: Reflections on participatory research on maternal health in Wakiso district, Uganda. Global Public Health, 11(5–6), 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1168864

O’Kane, P., Smith, A., & Lerman, M. P. (2021). Building Transparency and Trustworthiness in Inductive Research Through Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Organizational Research Methods, 24(1), 104–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119865016

Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Pain, H. (2012). A literature review to evaluate the choice and use of visual methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100401

Paulus, T., Woods, M., Atkins, D. P., & Macklin, R. (2017). The discourse of QDAS: reporting practices of ATLAS.ti and NVivo users with implications for best practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1102454

Peters, M., Godfrey, C., Mcinerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A., & Khalil, H. (2020). Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis.

Ronzi, S., Pope, D., Orton, L., & Bruce, N. (2016). Using photovoice methods to explore older people’s perceptions of respect and social inclusion in cities: Opportunities, challenges and solutions. SSM - Population Health, 2(August), 732–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.09.004

Ronzi, S., Puzzolo, E., Hyseni, L., Higgerson, J., Stanistreet, D., Hugo, Mb. N. B., Bruce, N., & Pope, D. (2019). Using photovoice methods as a community-based participatory research tool to advance uptake of clean cooking and improve health: The LPG adoption in Cameroon evaluation studies. Social Science and Medicine, 228(March), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.044

Schindel, T. J., Hughes, C. A., Makhinova, T., & Daniels, J. S. (2022). Drawing out experience: Arts-informed qualitative research exploring public perceptions of community pharmacy services. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18(1), 2200–2212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.03.006

Solano-Ruiz, Mc. C., Andina-Díaz, E., Noreña-Peña, A. L., & Siles-González, J. (2021). Photovoice and dramatisation in the classroom with nursing students: An exploratory study to raise awareness of the cultural and social dimensions of violence against women. Nurse Education Today, 103(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104974

Sommer, V. (2021). Multimodal Analysis in Qualitative Research: Extending Grounded Theory Through the Lens of Social Semiotics. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(8–9), 1102–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420978746

Wolski, U. (2018). The history of the development and propagation of QDA software. Qualitative Report, 23(13), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2984

Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D. P., & Macklin, R. (2016). Advancing Qualitative Research Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS)? Reviewing Potential Versus Practice in Published Studies using ATLAS.ti and NVivo, 1994–2013. Social Science Computer Review, 34(5), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315596311

Yu, C., Lou, C., Cheng, Y., Cui, Y., Lian, Q., Wang, Z., Gao, E., & Wang, L. (2019). Young internal migrants’ major health issues and health seeking barriers in Shanghai, China: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6661-0