Challenges Putted to Research Adapted to the Context and Researcher: Adequacy in front of Unity and Diversity.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This article is the result of a workshop’s preparations. In the structure of this event wore present two main objectives: to give a theoretic and methodological vision to the methodology adapted to the context and researcher; and to create a practical instrument applied to academic context. Our methodological proposal has been developed for eight years and looks for turn the research accessible to all. To this end we condense all our work, reuse authors, update others and added new. In the social research we defend that more important than what is new is the suitability to the reality in study. Without that we can access to the field. This mean to be open to the subjectivity and to be open to all possibilities within the social sciences, just as, have the ability to include all the elements of a research in holistically, without any exclusion. The extension of the information related with the workshop, that was planned don’t fit in just an article. In this way we decided divide this information in two different articles, one simultaneity philosophical, theoretical, and methodological nature and other related to one part imminently practical with his foundations. This first article presents the problem of the unity of being human, with reflex in a human science, that recognise, that not all is objective, rational and reduced to only one dimension. The social research needs to capture the unity and diversity of the human being, within its finitude, a being that transcend it’s self constantly. We propose to reflect and help to give answers to this challenge.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
openAccess
Becker, H. S. (1998). The tricks of the trade: how to think about your research while you’re doing it. The University of Chicago Press.
Bentz, V. M. & Shapiro, J. M. (1998). Mindful Inquiry in Social Research. Sage Publications, Ltd.
Berthelot, J.-M. (2018). Programmes, paradigmes, disciplines: pluralité et unité des sciences sociales. In Berthelot, J.-M. (ed.) Épistémologie des sciences sociales (2ª ed. Pp. 475 – 519). Presses Universitaires de France.
Camalhão, I. & Camalhão, S. (2019). Acesso da investigação para todos: uma metodologia adaptada e dirigida ao ser humano. Educação para o desenvolvimento. 7, 54 – 66. http://www.joaodedeus.pt/documentacao/revistacientifica/ED_7.pdf.
Camalhão, I. Camalhão, S. (2018, Julho, 10 - 12). Dilemas de Maria: manifesto da investigação para todos (Conference session). 7º Congresso Ibero-Americano em Investigação. Fotaleza. Brasil Qualitativa. https://proceedings.ciaiq.org/index.php/ciaiq2018/article/view/1627/1580
Chang, H. (2008). Autoetnography as method. Left Coast Press inc.
Clarke, A. E. (2015). From grounded theory to situational analysis: whats new? Why? How?. In Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., Washburn, R. (eds). Situational analysis in practice: mapping research with grounded theory (pp. 84 – 118). Left Coast inc.
Feyerabend, P. (2011). The tyranny of science. Polity Press.
Feyerabend, P. (1999). Conquest of abudance: a tale of abstration vesus the richness of being. The University of Chicago Press.
Feyerabend, P. (1991). Diálogo sobre o método (A. Guerreiro Trad.). Editorial Presença.
Frankel, E. (2017). The wisdom of not knowing: discovering a life of wonder by embracing uncertainy. Shambala Publications.
Frankel, E. (2003). The sacred therapy: Jewish spiritual teachings on emocional healing and inner wholeness. Shambala Publications.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2009). Herança e futuro da europa (A. Hall Trad.). Edições 70.
Glasser, B. G. (2001). The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Sociology Press.
Glasser, B. G & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative Research. Aldine.
Goertz, G. (2017). Multimethod research, causal mechanisms, and case studies. Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. (2020). Obras escolhidas de Jürgend Habermas volume V: crítica da razão (L. Nahodir Trad.). Edições 70.
Horkeimer, M. (2015). O eclipse da razão (J. T. Proença Trad.). Antigona.
Husserl, E. (2009). La filosofía ciencia rigorosa (M. Garcia-Baró Trad.). Encuentro.
Lahire, B. (2019). Dans le plis du social: individus, institutions, socialisations (2nd ed.). Editions La Decouverte.
Lahire, B. (2012). Monde pluriel: penser l’unité des sciences sociales. Éditions du Seuil.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. The University of Chicago Press.
Morin, E. (1990). Science avec conscience. Fayard.
Moustakas, C. & Moustakas, K. (2004). Loneliness, creativity & love: awakening meaning in life. Xlibris.
Moustakas, C. (1995). Being-in, being-for, being-with. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, inc.
Moustakas, C (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications inc.
Moustakas, C. (1990). Heurístic research: design, methodology and applications. Sage Publications inc.
Moscovici, S. (2013). Le scandale de la pensée sociale. Éditions de l’École des Houtes Études en Sciences Sociales.
Ni, H.-C. (1995). Hua hu ching: the later teachings of Lao Tzu. Shambala.
Przybylski, L. (2021). Hybrid etnography: online, offline, and in the between. Sage Publications Ltd.
Ragin, C. C. (2014). The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
Ragin, C. C. & Amoroso, L. M. (2019). Constructing social research: the unity and diversity of method (3 ed.). Sage Publications inc.
Ricoeur, P. (2019). O homem falível (H. Barros & G. Marcelo Trads). Edições 70.
Schütz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social word. Northwestern University Press.
Tzu, L. (1997). Tao te King: o caminho da virtude. (M. P. Fernandes, Trans.). Livros de Vida Editores.