CRITICAL THINKING IN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH A DISCUSSION FORUM: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1607-3741
Abstract
This research considers the analysis of critical thinking integrating the competencies of the citizens of the 21st century that in parallel with the Mexican high school curriculum. The objective of this research was to analyze the topic of relativity in the high school curriculum to promote the development of critical thinking in students, using a qualitative approach to understand the attitudes and experiences of students, considering the research question: how does the discussion forum on a topic of relativity influence the development of critical thinking in students? The qualitative methodology with non-probabilistic sampling by convenience, allowed arbitrarily choosing the students enrolled in the schooled modality in the Physics IV learning unit, considering the conceptual and operational definitions, to later take into account the categories and codes for the analysis of the levels of critical thinking achieved by the students in the discussion forum, the calculation of the ratio proposed by specialists in the subject was made. A triangulation of the nuclear variables: Communication, Learning and Critical Thinking was also made. By way of conclusion, a tendency of students towards critical thinking is observed, highlighting that written communication plays an important role in the construction of knowledge through codes that relate to each other with critical thinking. Students can develop communication and build knowledge, but critical thinking is not necessarily achieved, although there are incentives to develop it.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2024 New Trends in Qualitative Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
openAccess
Angulo, N. (2017). Glosario de la docencia en la sociedad del conocimiento. Colección Práctica Educativa. Coordinación Editorial de la Secretaría Académica de Instituto Politécnico Nacional.
Ávila, G. (2022). B-Learning mediante Moodle y su impacto en el proceso de aprendizaje de Física Moderna en el Bachillerato IPN. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Centro de Investigación en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México.
García-Aretio, L. (2002). La educación a distancia. De la teoría a la práctica. Ariel. Barcelona
Baharuddin, B. y Wahyuni, E.N. (2015). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Belloch, C. (2012). Introducción a Moodle.?Unidad de Tecnología Educativa.
Bossolasco, M. L. (2010). El foro de discusión.?Entorno mediado para la mediación cognitiva. Mendoza, AR: Editorial Virtual Argentina. Recuperado el,?20.
Bragado, I. M. (2018). Física general v. 1.1. Recuperado el 5 de enero de 2024 de: http://repositorio.ucam.edu
Dengo, F. O. (2014). Competencias del siglo XXI: guía práctica para promover su aprendizaje y evaluación. Capítulo Latinoamericano del Proyecto Atc210s.
Elder, L., y Paul, R. (2020). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Foundation for Critical Thinking. Rowman & Littlefield.
Halliday, D., Resnick, R., y Walker, J. (2016).?Fundamentos de física. Vol. I. Grupo Editorial Patria.
Ilesanmi, A. (2023). Teaching and Learning with Instructional Videos: Issues and Concerns for Educational Practice.?International Journal of Instructional Technology and Educational Studies,?4(1), 1-6.
Insight Assessment. (2020). The California Critical Thinking Test. Disponible en: https://www.insightassessment.com/article/scales-measured-by-the-cctst
Jamil, M., Muhammad, Y., y Qureshi, N. (2021). Secondary school science teachers’ practices for the development of critical thinking skills: An observational study. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 2(4), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2021(2-iv)22
Jamil, M., Mahmood, A., y Masood, S. (2023). Fostering Critical Thinking in Pakistani Secondary School Science: A Teacher's Viewpoint. Global Educational Studies Review, VIII(II),645-659. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2023(VIII-II).58
Jamil, M., Hafeez, F. A., y Muhammad, N. (2024). Critical thinking development for 21st century: Analysis of Physics curriculum. Journal of Social & Organizational Matters, 3(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56976/jsom.v3i1.45
Jones, C. (2015). Networked learning: An educational paradigm for the age of digital networks. Springer.
Mansur, A. (2005). Los nuevos entornos comunicacionales y el salón de clases. En Litwin, W. (comp.) Tecnologías educativas en tiempos de internet. Amorrortu. Bs. As.
Naseer, H., Muhammad, Y., y Jamil, M. (2022). Critical Thinking Skills in Pakistan Studies textbook: Qualitative Content Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 4(3), 744-755. DOI: 10.52567/pjsr.v4i03.764
Newman, D. R. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning.?Interpersonal Computing and Technology Journal,?3(2), 56-77.
Ochoa, E. (2022). La enseñanza y el aprendizaje desde la perspectiva del maestro.?Revista Dialogus, (9), 115-124.
Poquet, O., Trenholm, S., y Santolini, M. (2023). Forum posts, communication patterns, and relational structures: A multi-level view of discussions in online courses.?Educational technology research and development, 1-24.
Puig, B., Blanco-Anaya, P., y Bargiela, I. M. (2023). Integrar el Pensamiento Crítico en la Educación Científica en la Era de la Post-verdad. Revista Eureka sobre enseñanza y divulgación de las ciencias, 20(3), 330101-330117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2023.v20.i3.3301
Quecedo, R., y Castaño, C. (2002). Introducción a la metodología de investigación cualitativa. Revista de Psicodidáctica, No. 14. Págs. 5-40.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge.?Liberal education in a knowledge society,?97, 67-98.
Strauss, A., y Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Trimiño, B., y Zayas, Y. (2016). Estrategia didáctica para el fomento de la lectura en las clases.?Edusol,?16(55), 54-62.
Wagner, T. (2010). Overcoming The Global Achievement Gap (en línea). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Universidad de Harvard.
Yin, R. K. (2018).?Case study research and applications?(Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zhekova, M., Kehayov, T., y Gaftandzhieva, S. (2024). A Real-Time Web-Based Academic Discussion Platform. TEM Journal, 13(1). DOI: https://10.18421/TEM131-62