##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Antonio Eleazar Serrano-López https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1261-386X

Patricia Alonso-Álvarez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9305-6024

Elías Sanz-Casado https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0188-7489

José Carlos García-Zorita https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6860-8069

Abstract

The academic literature confirms the difference between the perspectives of students and professors when designing and applying teaching methodologies. This paper uses the case of entrepreneurship teaching in doctoral programs to point out the differences between both groups when designing the content of the modules. It also highlights the need to incorporate students' perspectives in the design of this type of courses. This article presents some of the first results of the prodPhD project, funded under the H2020-Swarfs program and started in 2020. The objective of this phase of the project is the design of information retrieval to know the needs of the university community (in particular, students and professors of doctoral programs) in terms of entrepreneurship education. The study uses a mixed methodology which includes surveys to students and professors and interviews to students from several universities and European countries. In a first phase, the interviews were distributed through the contact points of the universities. After the analysis of the results, interviews were conducted with those participants who showed interest in continuing the study. The results reveal that, in the field of entrepreneurship, students and professors have different priorities. It is therefore necessary to combine both perspectives and complement the needs of students with the knowledge and experience of professors to create attractive courses that offer students resources to fulfill their professional needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Empirical Studies with Methodological Reflection

How to Cite

Antonio Eleazar Serrano-López, Patricia Alonso-Álvarez, Elías Sanz-Casado, & José Carlos García-Zorita. (2022). Entrepreneurship in doctoral programs: Perspectives of doctoral students and professors on the content of the courses. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 12, e612. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.12.2022.e612
References

Syed Zamberi Ahmad & Robert Frederick Buchanan (2015). Entrepreneurship education in Malaysian universities, Tertiary Education and Management, 21(4), 349-366, 10.1080/13583883.2015.1106577

Almobaireek, W.N. & Manolova, T.S. (2012) Who Wants to Be an Entrepreneur? Entrepreneurial Intentions among Saudi University Students. African Journal of Business Management, 6, 4029-4040. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.1521

Arasti, Z., Falavarjani, M. K., & Imanipour, N. (2012). A Study of Teaching Methods in Entrepreneurship Education for Graduate Students. Higher education studies, 2(1), 2-10. 10.5539/hes.v2n1p2

Bienkowska, D., & Klofsten, M. (2012). Creating entrepreneurial networks: academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education. Higher Education, 64(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9488-x

Cope, J. (2005). Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 29(4), 373-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00090.x

Corrales, K. A., Paba Rey, L. A., & Santiago Escamilla, N. (2016). Is EMI enough? Perceptions from university professors and students. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5294/7094

Davey, T., Hannon, P., & Penaluna, A. (2016). Entrepreneurship education and the role of universities in entrepreneurship: Introduction to the special issue. Industry and higher education, 30(3), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422216656699

Gibb, A. (2002). In pursuit of a new ‘enterprise’ and ‘entrepreneurship’ paradigm for learning: creative destruction, new values, new ways of doing things and new combinations of knowledge. International journal of management reviews, 4(3), 233-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00086

Gómez-Rey, Pilar; Barbera, Elena; Fernández-Navarro, Francisco (2016). Measuring teachers and learners’ perceptions of the quality of their online learning experience. Distance Education, 37(2), 146–163. doi:10.1080/01587919.2016.1184396

Groves, R.M., Fowler Jr, F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E. & Tourangeau, R. (2011) Survey methodology. John Wiley & Sons.

Hurt, R. L., & McLaughlin, E. J. (2012). An applied introduction to qualitative research methods in academic advising. NACADA Journal, 32(1), 63-71.

Hytti, U., & O’Gorman, C. (2004). What is “enterprise education”? An analysis of the objectives and methods of enterprise education programmes in four European countries. Education+ training. 46(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910410518188

Joye, D., Wolf, C., Smith, T. & Fu, Y. (2016). Survey methodology: challenges and principles. In Joye, D., Wolf, C., Smith, T. & Fu, Y. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of survey Methodology (pp. 3-15). SAGE Publications Ltd, https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893

Lindh, I., & Thorgren, S. (2016). Entrepreneurship education: the role of local business. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(5-6), 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1134678

Love, H. R., & Corr, C. (2022). Integrating Without Quantitizing: Two Examples of Deductive Analysis Strategies Within Qualitatively Driven Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689821989833

Myers, S. A., Horan, S. M., Kennedy-Lightsey, C. D., Madlock, P. E., Sidelinger, R. J., Byrnes, K., ... & Mansson, D. H. (2009). The relationship between college students' self-reports of class participation and perceived instructor impressions. Communication Research Reports, 26(2), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090902861580

Muscio, A., & Ramaciotti, L. (2019). How does academia influence Ph. D. entrepreneurship? New insights on the entrepreneurial university. Technovation, 82, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.02.003

Nardi, P.M. (2018) Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. Routledge.

Neck, H. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2018). The scholarship of teaching and learning entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 8-41.

Nicotra, M., Del Giudice, M., & Romano, M. (2021). Fulfilling University third mission: towards an ecosystemic strategy of entrepreneurship education. Studies in Higher Education, 46(5), 1000-1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896806.

Pearcy, M. (2014). Student, teacher, professor: Three perspectives on online education. The History Teacher, 47(2), 169-185. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43264218.

Peng, Z., Lu, G., & Kang, H. (2013). Entrepreneurial intentions and its influencing factors: A survey of the university students in Xi’an China. Creative education, 3(08), 95. 10.4236/ce.2012.38B021

Rosenberg, H., & Asterhan, C. S. (2018). “Whatsapp, teacher?”-student perspectives on teacher-student Whatsapp interactions in secondary schools. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 205-226. https://doi.org/10.28945/4081

Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and corporate change, 16(4), 691-791. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm023

Seikkula?Leino, J., Ruskovaara, E., Ikavalko, M., Mattila, J. & Rytkola, T. (2010), Promoting entrepreneurship education: the role of the teacher?, Education + Training, 54(2), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011027716

Tjeerdsma, B. L. (1997). A comparison of teacher and student perspectives of tasks and feedback. Journal of teaching in physical education, 16(4), 388-400. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.16.4.388

Torres, C. T. (2010). Consideraciones para la formación en emprendimiento: explorando nuevos ámbitos y posibilidades. Estudios gerenciales, 26(117), 41-60.

Zappe, S., Hochstedt, K., Kisenwether, E., & Shartrand, A. (2013). Teaching to innovate: Beliefs and perceptions of instructors who teach entrepreneurship to engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(1), 45-62.