Digital Information and Communication Technology Application in Higher Education
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Introduction: This study focuses on Information and Communication Digital Technologies (ICDT) incorporated to the subject Health Promotion 1 (HP1) of the Public Health undergraduate course in a public university. It has been offered on line since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Aim: To analyze students’ perception of ICDT use in the process of teaching-earning in PS1. Methods: Qualitative research of case study of Microsoft Forms’ answer sheets filled by the students. The data’s thematic analysis disclosed three categories: “digital resources’ evaluation for learning objectives”, “consequences of including Social Health Determinants (SHD), intersectoral and National Health Promotion Policy (NHPP) action in manager’s professional development” and “group interaction’s potential to construct learning”. Results: ICDT usage is considered an important strategy in the mediation of students with goals and contents prepared to their qualification as managers. Their statements show the relevance of including SHD, intersectoral action to their professional qualification. These issues are linked to NHPP, as subside their act as future managers and to develop critical thinking skills. Students’ declarations unveil the existence of interaction in HP1 groups in jointly construct activities. Conclusions: The use of ICDT brought about multiple learning experiences, intensified the appropriation/application of SHD and intersectoral partnerships in actions to promote health as registered in the Manager Project. Hence, the case study made the professor reflect on her function and strive to comprehend how the students learn to be and act in the world.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
openAccess
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. (3. Reimp.). Lisboa: Edições 70.
Batistella, C. (2007). Abordagens contemporâneas do conteúdo do conceito de saúde. In A. F. Fonseca & A. M. D. Corbo (Orgs.) O território e o processo saúde-doença. (Coleção Educação Profissional e Docência em Saúde: a Formação e o Trabalho do Agente Comunitário de Saúde, 1, pp. 51-86). Rio de Janeiro: EPSJV; FIOCRUZ.
Becker, H. S. (1993). Métodos de pesquisa em ciências sociais. São Paulo: Hucitec.
Blurton, C. (1999). New directions in education: challenges in education. In G. Bartagnon. & Y. Courrier (Eds.), World communication an information report 1999-2000 (pp. 46-61). Paris: UNESCO.
Budd, J., Miller, B.S., Manning, E.M., Lmapos, V., Zhuang, M., Edelsteins, M., Rees, G. Emerey, V. C., Stevens, M. M., Keegan, N., Short, M. J., Pillay, D., Manley, E., Cox, I. J., Heymann, D., Johnson, A. M., McKendry, R. A. (2020). Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19. Nature Med, 26, 1183–1192.
Cummings, C. & O’Neil, T. (2015). Do digital information and communications technologies increase the voice and influence of women and girls?: A rapid review of the evidence. Shaping policy for development (March, 2015). London: ODI Reports.
Frykedal, K. F., & Chiriac, E. H. (2011). Assessment of students’ learning when working in groups. Educational Research, 53(3), 331-345.
Goldenberg, M. (2001). A arte de pesquisar: como fazer pesquisa qualitativa em Ciências Sociais. (5. Ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Record.
Hall, D. & Buzwell, S. (2012). The problem of free riding in group projects: looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 37-49.
Hassanien, A. (2006). Student experience of group work and group assessment in higher education. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 6(1), 17-39.
Ministério da Saúde (2002). As cartas da promoção da saúde (Série B. Textos Básicos em Saúde). Brasília: Ministério da Saúde.
Ministério da Saúde (2018). Política Nacional de Promoc?ão da Saúde: Anexo I da Portaria de Consolidac?ão no 2, de 28 de setembro de 2017. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde.
Mishra, P. & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st- century learning: results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 6-19.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants’ part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Saviani, D. (2007). Pedagogia: o espaço da educação na universidade. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 37(130), 9-134.
Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
Schön, D. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Handbook of qualitative research. (2nd ed.). California: Sage.