Going Beyond a Conflict of Approaches in Psychiatric Care: The Perks of Interdisciplinary Research
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Abstract: Our research studied the interactions between mental health care (MHC) professionals and users in French public psychiatry, focusing on the “tools” which professionals use in their interactions with users. We draw a typology of four main “therapeutic styles” in relation to tool use: 1- Absence of identifiable tools. Interaction is personalized and improvised. 2- Use of rituals and habits. 3- Use of methods that have otherwise been written and formalized. 4- Use of tools, be they written or computerized, protocols guiding the interactions, or strictly standardized tools. The psychologist involved in the research (HH) intends to show how the practice of interdisciplinary fieldwork, which implied the “trouble of having a psychologist sharing fieldwork”, enabled both researchers to transform a classical methodology into a series of questions concerning the focus of data gathering and data analysis, the position and stance of both researchers, and the possibility to provide not only valid descriptions of day-to-day care practices but also correct interpretations of the unconscious feelings at stake in MHC.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Audoux, C., & Gillet, A. (2011). Recherche partenariale et co-construction de savoirs entre chercheurs et acteurs: l’épreuve de la traduction [Partenarial research and knowledge co- construction between researchers and actors: the trial of translation]. Revue Interventions Économiques, 43, Article hal-00742885. https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.1347
Beaud, S., & Weber, F. (2017). Guide de l’enquête de terrain: produire et analyser des données ethnographiques [Field survey guide: producing and analyzing ethnographic data]. La Découverte.
Bidet, A. (2006). Sociologie du travail et activité. Le travail en actes, nouveaux regards [Sociology of work and activity. Work in action, new visions]. Octarès Editions.
Bonnafé, L. (1991). Désaliéner? folie(s) et société(s) [De-alienating? Madness and society]. Presses universitaires du Mirail.
Brossard, B. (2013). L’organisation sociale des « hasards heureux »: Qu’est-ce qu’un soin en psychiatrie? [The social organization of serendipity: what is care in psychiatry?]. Sociologie Du Travail, 55(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soctra.2012.12.003
Carpentier, N. (2001). Le long voyage des familles: la relation entre la psychiatrie et la famille au cours du XXe siècle [The long journey of families: the relationship between psychiatry and families during the 20th century]. Sciences Sociales et Santé, 19(1), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.3406/sosan.2001.1514
Castarède, M. -F. (2013). L’entretien clinique à visée de recherche [The clinical research interview]. In C. Chiland (Ed.), L’entretien clinique (pp. 139–172). Presses universitaires de France.
Dasen, P. R. (2019). The trouble of having a psychologist sharing field work. In A. Von Poser & A. Von Poser (Eds.), Facets of fieldwork. Essays in honor of Jürg Wassmann (pp. 255–271). Universitätsverlag Winter.
Davies, J., & Spencer, D. (Eds.). (2010). Emotions in the Field. The Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork Experience. Stanford University Press.
Demailly, L., & De la Broise, P. (2009). Les enjeux de la déprofessionnalisation [The stakes of deprofessionalisation]. Socio-Logos. Revue de l’association Française de Sociologie, 4, Article 151828371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/socio-logos.2305
Durkheim, É. (2009). Les règles de la méthode sociologique [The rules of sociological method]. Payot & Rivages. (Original work published 1894).
Fraher, A. L., & Gabriel, Y. (2014). Dreaming of flying when grounded: occupational identity and occupational fantasies of furloughed airline pilots. Journal of Management Studies, 51(6), 926-995. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12081
Flick, U., Foster, J., & Caillaud, S. (2015). Researching social representations. In E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, G. Sammut, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 64–80). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323650.007
Haliday, H. (2019). Qui prend soin du réseau? Essai d’actualisation du paradigme de la psychothérapie institutionnelle dans le système de santé mentale français [Who cares for the network? A tentative actualization of the institutional psychotherapy paradigm in the French mental health system]. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, 177(10), 1005–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMP.2019.09.010
Hofmann, S. G., & Asnaani, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy Research, 36, 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608- 012-9476-1
Hughes, E. (1976). The social drama of work. Mid-American Review of Sociology, 1(1), 1–7. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23252599
Johansson, H., & Eklund, M. (2003). Patients’ opinion on what constitutes good psychiatric care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 17(4), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0283-9318.2003.00233.x
Klein, M. (1975). Love, guilt and reparation and other works. MacMillan.
Leboyer, M., & Llorca, P.-M. (2018). Psychiatrie: l’état d’urgence [Psychiatry: a state of urgency].Fayard.
Leichsenring, F., & Steinert, C. (2019). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy: an up-to- date review. In D. Kealy & J. S. Ogrodniczuk (Eds.), Contemporary Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (pp. 47–74). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813373-6.00004-0
Lippke, L., & Tanggaard, L. (2014). Leaning in to “muddy” interviews. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413510869
Marx, K. (2007). Les Manuscrits économico-philosophiques de 1844 [Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844]. Vrin.
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and erformance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.I037t/0021-9010.85.2.273
Morin, P., Bossé, P.-L., Carrier, S., Garon, S., & Lambert, A. (2015). La personnalisation des services de santé mentale: une voie d’avenir [The personalization of mental health care services: a way forward]. Santé mentale au Québec, 40(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.7202/1032387ar
Muusse, C., Kroon, H., Mulder, C. L., & Pols, J. (2020). Working on and with relationships: relational work and spatial understandings of good care in community mental healthcare in trieste. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 44(4), 544-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-020-09672-8
Oury, J. (2001). Psychiatrie et psychothérapie institutionnelle : traces et configurations précaires [Psychiatrie and institutional psychotherapy: traces and precarious configurations]. Les éditions du champ social.
Paillé, P. (2011). Les conditions de l’analyse qualitative [Qualitative analysis conditions]. SociologieS, July 2011, 0–13. http://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/3557
Petriglieri, G., & Petriglieri, J. L. (2020). The return of the oppressed: a systems psychodynamic approach to organization studies. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 411–449. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0007
Robertson, W. (1994). The concept of guilt. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 32(1), 15–18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8145194/#:~:text=Guilt%20is%20an%20uncomfortable%20feeling,the%20uncomfortable%20feeling%20(distress).
Sassolas, M. (2019). Le stylo du psychiatre. Plaidoyer pour une psychiatrie relationnelle [The psychiatrist’s pen. Pleading for a relational psychiatry]. ERES. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3917/eres.sasso.2019.01
Schein, E. H. (1987). The Clinical Perspective in Fieldwork. Sage.
Stiegler, B. (2015). L’emploi est mort, vive le travail! Entretien avec Ariel Kyrou [Employment is dead, all hail work! Interview with Ariel Kyrou]. Editions des 1001 nuits.
Tanggaard, L. (2014). Ethnographic fieldwork in psychology: lost and found? Qualitative Inquiry, 20(2), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413510876
Ughetto, P. (2018). Les nouvelles sociologies du travail. Introduction à la sociologie de l’activité [The new sociologies of work. Introduction to activity sociology]. De Boeck Supérieur.
Venet, E. (2020). Manifeste pour une psychiatrie artisanale [Manifest for an artisanal psychiatry]. Verdier.
Wassmann, J., & Dasen, P. R. (1993). Alltagswissen. Les savoirs quotidiens. Everyday Cognition. Freiburg University.
Wing, J. K. (1962). Institutionalism in Mental Hospitals. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1962.tb00680.x.