Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciences

Autores

  • Nadia Steils IAE Lille, University of Lille, Lille Economy and Management, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.6.2021.24-31

Palavras-chave:

qualitative experiments, validity criteria, methodology, qualitative research

Resumo

Abstract: This paper presents the qualitative experiment as an alternative methodological solution that combines an open qualitative approach, and a structured and controlled experiment. Using three studies, including both a qualitative experiment and a traditional in-depth interviews approach, we compare the findings of both approaches to identify the benefits and risks of qualitative experiments. Our findings contribute by presenting a methodological framework and technical recommendations based on three validity criteria (internal, external, and interpretivist validity). The results thereby contribute methodologically by empirically investigating the usefulness of qualitative experiments based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative validity criteria identified in the literature.

Referências

Andrews, I. & Oster, E. (2018). Weighting for external validity. NBER Working paper series, N° 23826, 1-62.

Bartlett, F. C. (1952). Review of thinking: An introduction to its experimental. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4(1), 87-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053080

Bartlett, F. C. (1995). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1932)

Campbell D. T., & Stanley J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin.

Cho, Y. -J., Fu, P. -W. & Wu, C. -C. (2017). Popular research topics in marketing journals, 1995- 2014. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 40, 52-72. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2017.06.003

Decuir-Gunby, J., & Schutz, P. (2017). Chapter 6 mixed methods designs: frameworks for organizing your research methods. In J. DeCuir-Gunby, & P. Schutz (Eds.), Developing a mixed methods proposal: A practical guide for beginning researchers (pp. 83-106). Sage.

Dülmer, H. (2015). The factorial survey: Design selection and its impact on Reliability and internal validity. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(2) 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115582269

Hayashi, P. Jr., Abib, G., and Hoppen, N. (2019), Validity in qualitative research: A processual approach. The Qualitative Report, 24(1) 98-112. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss1/8/

Kleining, G. (1986). Das qualitative experiment [The qualitative experiment]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 38, 724-750. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/863

Kleining, G. (1991). The qualitative experiment. In U. Flick, E. V. Kardoff, H. Keupp, L. V. Rosenstiel, & S. Wolff (Eds.), Handbuch qualitative Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Konzepte, Methoden und Anwendungen (pp. 263-266). Beltz.

Kleining, G. & Witt H. (2000). The qualitative heuristic approach: A methodology for discovery in psychology and the social sciences. Rediscovering the method of introspection as an example. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), 1-6. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1123/2495

Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E. & Mainemelis, C. (2002). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.). Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles (pp. 227-248). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Leviton, L. C. (2017). Generalizing about public health interventions: A mixed-methods approach to external validity. Annual Review of Public Health, 38(1), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044509

Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100301

Lynch, J. G. (1982). On the external validity of experiments in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225-239. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488619

Lynch, J. G. (1983). The role of external validity in theoretical research. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(1), 109-111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2488860

Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage.

Ramirez-Montoya, M.-S. & Lugo-Ocando, J. (2020). Systematic review of mixed methods in the framework of educational innovation. Media Education Research Journal, 28(65) 9-20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1267414

Robinson, S. & Mendelson, A. L. (2012). A qualitative experiment: Research on mediated meaning construction using a hybrid approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 332-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812444789

Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005.

Seltman, H. J. (2018). Experimental design and analysis, e-book http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~hseltman/309/Book/Book.pdf

Slack, M.K. & Draugalis, J.R. (2001). Establishing the internal and external validity of experimental studies. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 58(22), 2173-2181. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11760921/

Wagoner, B. (2015). Qualitative experiments in psychology: The case of Frederic Bartlett's methodology. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(3), 1-38. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2367/3870

Whittemore, R., Chase, K.C., and Mandle, C.L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119299

Downloads

Publicado

2021-03-12

Como Citar

Nadia Steils. (2021). Qualitative Experiments for Social Sciences. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 6, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.6.2021.24-31