WHERE EVERY ‘ONE’ KNOWS YOUR NAME: THE TRANSFORMATIVE POWER OF QUALITATIVE APPROACHES IN COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Using an autoethnographic lens, we explore our transition from external observers, scholars, and experts in our field to integral members of the community with whom we work. More specifically, this essay focuses on the pivotal role qualitative research played in this transformation, fostering deeper engagement, mutual understanding, and collective action among all stakeholders—coresearchers and researchers alike. Researchers can immerse themselves in community settings using qualitative approaches such as ethnography, qualitative case study, and phenomenology, leading to a deeper connection and genuine partnership with community members. Qualitative methods integrated with participatory evaluation approaches engender trust and communicate respect, which is crucial as researchers move beyond mere data collection (and their titles) to become co-creators of knowledge with the community, a community where everyone knows their name. Researchers who dispositionally embrace humility and reflexivity—continuously reflecting on and adjusting one’s role in relation to the community—are much more likely to experience positional shifts with the organizations and people with whom they are working, becoming a part of the collective. Becoming an ‘Us’ is where researchers learn about the community and from it, leading to a shared identity and purpose. This transformation is critical for conducting research and program evaluation that is not only about the community but for and with it, leading to outcomes that are truly beneficial and supported by those involved. We aim to showcase how embracing the community as partners and co-researchers can lead to more impactful and sustainable changes. We provide a platform for discussing how to navigate the challenges of this transformation and how to effectively leverage the collective power of community and research expertise for social change.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2024 New Trends in Qualitative Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
openAccess
American Evaluation Association (AEA), (2018). Guiding principles for evaluators. https://www.eval.org/About/Guiding-Principles
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative sociology, 42, 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
Bates, E. A., McCann, J. J., Kaye, L. K., & Taylor, J. C. (2017). “Beyond words”: A researcher’s guide to using photo elicitation in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1359352
Busetto, L., Wick, W. & Gumbinger, C. How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurol. Res. Pract. 2, 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Practical strategies for culturally competent evaluation. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov
Dobmeier, R. A., Reiner, J. M., & Hernandez, R. T. (2017). Mental health and incarceration: Barriers to treatment. Social Work in Public Health, 32(4), 238-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2016.1245804
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589
Fetterman, D. M. (2019). Empowerment evaluation and social justice: Power, influence, and impact. Guilford Press.
Fetterman, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. Guilford Press.
Gill, S., Kuwahara, R., & Wilce, M. (2016). Through a culturally competent lens: Why the program evaluation standards matter. Health Promotion Practice, 17(1), 5–8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26746759
Graham, I. D., & Tetroe, J. (2007). How to translate health research knowledge into effective healthcare action. Healthcare Quarterly, 10(3), 20-22. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2007.18853
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1), 173-202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
Jull, J., Giles, A., & Graham, I. D. (2017). Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: Advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implementation Science, 12(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3
Kellogg Foundation. (1992). Community-based public health: Principles and practices. W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
Kolodziejczak, K., Smart, R., & Saunders, S. (2018). Reducing mental health crises through community initiatives. Journal of Behavioral Health, 7(3), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1037/bhs0000056
Madon, N. S., & Murphy, K. (2021). Trust and bias in policing: Exploring citizens' perceptions. Journal of Criminology, 54(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2020.1860730
Milacci, F., Volk, F., & Smith Ramey, J. (2024). Taking it to the street: A conceptual model promoting the essentiality of trust in community-focused qualitative research. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 20(3), e961. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.20.3.2024.e961
Myhill, A., & Bradford, B. (2012). Can police enhance public confidence by improving quality of service? Policing and Society, 22(4), 397-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2012.703199
Peterson, J., Andrews, R., & Brown, S. (2020). Co-response models for mental health crises: Evidence from community policing evaluations. Journal of Public Safety, 45(4), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2020.1734302
Pope, L., Smith, R., & Johnson, A. (2013). A review of mental health services in the criminal justice system. Criminal Justice Review, 38(2), 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016812471984
Smith Ramey, J., Volk, F., Milacci, F., & Kelley, B. (2023). “If not you, then who?”: A qualitative case study of a drug treatment court. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2023.2243494
Smith Ramey, J., Volk, F., & Milacci, F. (2023) Facilitators and barriers of implementing an evidence-based practice in a rural community setting: A qualitative case study. Global Implementation Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-023-00105-3
van Bekkum, J. E. (2016). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(10), 2333-2334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13024
Wallerstein, N., Duran, B., Oetzel, J., & Minkler, M. (Eds.). (2018). Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6311-932X