MANAGING RECRUITMENT AND DATA COLLECTION: ONLINE FOCUS GROUPS BEST PRACTICES AND STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS SCAMMERS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Common methods to collect data include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method approaches. Although it is common to complete data collection in-person, the onset of COVID-19 has resulted in the increased use of online modalities. Qualitative research is commonly gathered through individual or focus group interviews. However, best practices outlining strategies when conducting online focus groups and approaches to address issues specific to online research (i.e., scammers) are limited. Due to the growing use of data collection through such means, it is imperative to draw out specific strategies that could regulate data quality and reduce the chances of scamming. The current article addresses this practical gap by providing a synthesis of the available literature on online focus groups that document best practices and suggestions to deal with scammers which is currently missing from the literature. The goal was to provide initial suggestions to improve data quality of online focus groups by examining the available literature that outlines best practices, addresses the issues of scammers, and to provide a concise and comprehensive overview of identified literature The article is organized beginning with a review of the literature. The research is then synthesized including an outline of best practices and strategies to address scammers when engaging in online focus groups. The article closes with a discussion of the significance of the review, limitations, and article summary. Scammers are prevalent in online spaces. Although this article provides a preliminary outline of suggestions from the literature, more research is necessary that provides specific examples of how challenges have been addressed and the impact of including the recommended strategies on the research process and outcomes.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Agius, S. (2013). Qualitative research: Its value and applicability. The Psychiatrist, 27, 204-206.https://doi.org/10.1192/pb/bp.113.042770
Amri, M., Angelakis, C., & Logan, D. (2021). Utilizing synchronous email interviews for health
research: Overview of benefits and drawbacks. BMC, 14(148), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05547-2
Asper, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology,42,139-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
Brown, R. (2022). Best practices for conducting virtual focus groups. Publications and Scholarship, 6, 1-38. https://source.sheridancollege.ca/ctl_publ/6
Daniel, E. (2016). The usefulness of qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in researching problem-solving ability in science education curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 91-100.
Daniels, N., Gillen, P., Casson, K., & Wilson, I. (2019). STEER: Factors to consider when designing online focus groups using audiovisual technology in health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1-11. DOI: 10.1177/1609406919885786
Davies, L., LeClair, K. L., Bagley, P., Blunt, H., Hinton, L., Ryan, S., & Ziebland, S. (2020). Face-to-face compared with online collected accounts of health and illness experiences: A scoping review. Qualitative Health Research, 30(13), 2092-2102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320935835
De Man, J., Campbell, L., Tabana, H., & Wouter, E. (2021). The pandemic of online research in times of COVID-19. BMJ, 11(3043866), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043866
Flicker, S. (2004). “Ask me no secrets, I’ll tell you no lies:” What happens a respondent’s story makes no sense. The Qualitative Report, 9(3), 528-537. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2004.1922
Forrestal, S. G., D’Angelo, A. V., & Vogel, L. K. (2015). Considerations for and lessons learned from online synchronous focus groups. Survey Practice, 8(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2015-0015
Huckins, G. (2021). How to safeguard online data collection against fraud. https://www.spectrumnews.org/opinion/how-to-safeguard-online-data-collection-against-fraud/
Jackson II, R. L., Drummond, D. K., & Camara, S. (2007). What is qualitative research?Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459430701617879
Jones, A., Caes, L., Rugg, T., Noel, M., Bateman, S., & Jordan, A. (2021). Challenging issues of integrity and identity of participants in non-synchronous online qualitative methods. Methods in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100072
Keemink, J. R., Sharp, R. J., Dargan, A. K., & Forder, J. E. (2022). Reflections on the use of synchronous online focus groups in social care research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221095314
Keen, S., Lomeli-Rodriguez, M., & Joffe, H. (2022). From challenge to opportunity: Virtual qualitative research during COVID-19 and beyond. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221105075
Lawlor, J., Thomas, C., Guhin, A. T., Kenyon, K., Lerner, M. D., UCAS Consortium, & Drahota, A. (2021). Suspicious and fraudulent online survey participation: Introducing the REAL framework. Methodological Innovations, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991211050467
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1982). Establishing dependability and confirmability in naturalistic inquiry through an audit. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED216019.pdf
Marques, I. C., Theiss, L. M., Johnson, C. Y., Vickers, S. M., Fouad, M. N., Scarinci, I. C., & Chu, D. I. (2021). Implementation of virtual focus groups for qualitative data collection in a global pandemic. The American Journal of Surgery, 221, 918-922.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.009
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Mick, C. S., & Middlebrook, G. (2015). Asynchronous and synchronous modalities. In B. L. Hewett, K. E. DePew, E. Guler, & R. Z. Warner (Eds.)., Foundational practices of online writing instruction (pp. 135-154). The WAC Clearinghouse, Parlor Press.
Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129-152.
Namey, E., Guest, G., O’Regan, A., Godwin, C. L., Taylor, J., & Martinez, A. (2020). How does mode of qualitative data collection affect data and cost? Findings from a quasi-experimental study. Field Methods, 32(1), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X19886839
Oringderff, J. (2004). “My way”: Piloting an online focus group. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(3), 60-75.
Osburn, J., Caruso, G., & Wolfensberger, W. (2011). The concept of “best practice”: A brief of its meanings, scope, usage, and shortcomings. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 58(3), 213-222. DOI: 10.1080/1034912X.2011.598387
Ratislavova, K., & Ratislav, J. (2014). Asynchronous email interview as a qualitative research method in the humanities. Human Affairs, 24, 452-460. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0240-y
Roehl, J. M., & Harland, D. J. (2022). Imposter participants: Overcoming methodological challenges related to balancing participant privacy with data quality when using online recruitment and data collection. The Qualitative Report, 27(11), 2469-2485. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5475
Rodgers, E. (2024). Conducting online focus groups [2023 ultimate guide]. https://www.driveresearch.com/market-research-company-blog/what-are-online-focus-groups-market-research-firm-upstate-ny/
Rodham, K., & Gavin, J. (2006). The ethics of using the internet to collect qualitative research data. Research Ethics, 2(3), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610600200303
Rupert, D. J., Poehlman, J. A., Hayes, J. J., Ray, S. E., Moultrie, R. R. (2017). Virtual versus in-person focus groups: Comparison of costs, recruitment, and participant logistics. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(3), e80. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6980
Samardzic, T., Wildman, C., Barata, P. C., & Morton, M. (2023). Considerations for conducting online focus groups on sensitive topics. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2185985
Teitcher, J. E. F., Bockting, W. O., Bauermeister, J. A., Hoefer, C. J., Miner, M. H., & Klitzman, R. L. (2015). Detecting, preventing, and responding to “fraudsters” in internet research: Ethics and Tradeoffs. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(1), 116-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12200
Tran, B., Rafinejad-Farahani, B., Moodie, S., O’Hagan, R., & Glista, D. (2021). A scoping review of virtual focus group methods used in rehabilitation sciences. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211042227
Turato, E. R. (2005). Qualitative and quantitative methods in health: Definitions, differences and research subjects. Re Saude Publica, 39(3), 1-8.
Turney, L. & Pocknee, C. (2005). Virtual focus groups: New frontiers in research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(2), 32-43.
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55((1), 22-45.
Willemsen, R. F., Aardoom, J. J., Chavannes N. H., & Versluis, A. (2022). Online synchronous focus group interviews: Practical considerations. Qualitative Research, 0(0), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221110161
Zagonel, A. M., King, A. E. H., Baker, L. M., Lindsey A. B., Anderson, S., Telg, R. W., & McLeod-Morin, A. (2022). Shifting focus: Collecting focus group data online. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, AEC752, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-WC413-2022